Readers' comments (6) 
Posted by gary hathaway on 3 December 2008 at 19:23 Any closer to publishing this redbook? it is a great piece of work and I am looking forward to seeing the "finished" book. Any chance that you would be adding an RMC process front end to create a process template to the lifecycle? Thx |
Posted by Dr. Mats Göthe on 9 December 2008 at 7:42 We are targeting a publication date by end of December. This final version will not contain any significant changes to existing content. |
Posted by Robert David on 9 February 2009 at 10:43 Typo Page 45 Project health and dashboard Last line of the first paragraph Gantt charts are nice, but do they or hinder your ability to execute? Missing the word help. |
Posted by Robert David on 9 February 2009 at 13:20 Typo Page 43 (adobe reader 63) Iterative development Many enterprises have not adopted iterative development, and yet it must be proven as an effective tool for managing risk and achieving user acceptance more easily. ... even though it has been proven as an effective tool ... |
Posted by Robert David on 9 February 2009 at 19:12 Typo Page 72 (adobe reader 92) 3.7.2 Product integrations for this scenario Rational RequisitePro and Rational Requirements Composer Second paragraph: The sketches that are created in Rational RequisitePro Composer are linked to the requirements that are managed by Rational RequisitePro. Second sentence should be: The sketches that are created in Rational Requirements Composer ... not Rational RequisitePro Composer. |
Posted by Robert David on 10 February 2009 at 15:03 Typo Figure 4-7 Traceability and impact analysis Top-right note, fourth word: If the stakeholder reuest changes, this change might impact the feature that is traced to it. reuest -> request |